UK regulators admission of 41% inflation and systemic fear of bank runs.

UK Raises Deposit Limit to £120,000: Regulator’s Admits 41% Inflation & Systemic Fear of Bank Runs
November 19 (King World News) – Email from King World News reader and retired pawnbroker Gurjit L.:  The UK’s Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) limit is rising dramatically from £85,000 to £120,000 from December 1st, 2025 [Ref 1]. While the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) frames this as a routine adjustment to enhance “public confidence”, the magnitude of the increase—a leap of over 41%—acts as an official confirmation that the purchasing power of protected savings has been decimated since 2017. This move is less an increase in security and more a defensive posture against both economic erosion and the chilling threat of digital bank runs seen globally.

The Inflation Calculation: 41% Erosion Confirmed
The core driver behind the £35,000 increase is the unprecedented inflation experienced in the UK between January 2017 (when the £85,000 limit was set) and the present.

The percentage increase required to restore the original real value of the protected deposit is calculated as:

$$\text{Increase} = \frac{£120,000 – £85,000}{£85,000} \times 100 \approx \mathbf{41.2\%}$$

This figure formally acknowledges the severe loss of purchasing power for savers who kept funds protected within the banking system. The increase ensures that £120,000 today theoretically buys the same amount as £85,000 did in 2017, using the regulator’s preferred inflation metric [Ref 2]. The implicit confession is that the central bank policies, which led to this inflation, severely impacted the real value of citizens’ protected savings.

A Pawnbroker’s Lesson: Risk vs. Guarantee from the Bench
In the world of lending, everything comes down to risk of devaluation. When I used to work in the shop, standing behind that worn wooden bench, we always had to carefully judge the risk of a good’s devaluation versus what we could loan against it.

For an item like a television or a computer, the risk of rapid obsolescence and falling value was high; the loan amount would be small. But for gold, the risk was always minimal. It’s a universal currency that maintains its purchasing power, so we could always lend more aggressively against it. The reason is simple: Gold protects against the very erosion that cash suffers. The UK FSCS promises to give you your cash back if the bank fails, but it offers zero protection against the central bank (the BoE) failing to maintain the value of that cash [Ref 3].

The actual performance of gold proves this lesson: while the protected cash only needed a 41.2% increase to keep its 2017 value, gold priced in sterling has surged by over 225% in the same period [Ref 4]. The Bank of England’s deposit guarantee is a shield against bank failure, but gold is the ultimate insurance against monetary failure.

The Regulator’s Verdict: Do We Think UK Banks Are Safe?
The ultimate decision on raising the FSCS limit comes from the Bank of England (BoE) and the PRA. Their official position is that the major UK banks are safe and highly resilient.

1. Capital Resilience (Stress Tests)

  • Tougher Testing: The BoE regularly subjects the seven largest and most systemic banks (e.g., Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds, NatWest) to severe but plausible stress tests [Ref 9].
  • Hypothetical Shock: These tests model a global financial crash, including a deep recession, a 5% fall in UK GDP, unemployment peaking at 8.5%, and the Bank Rate rising to 8% [Ref 10].
  • Conclusion: The banks are assessed to be able to withstand such a severe shock while continuing to lend to households and businesses. They maintain large capital buffers specifically for this purpose [Ref 11].

2. Commercial Debt Exposure

  • Containment: The most acute risk of failure is currently found in Commercial Real Estate (CRE) lending, but the BoE believes that banks’ direct exposure to this sector is now lower and better collateralised than before the 2008 crisis [Ref 12].
  • Systemic Strength: While individual commercial debt failures and derivative risks are still present, the system as a whole is assessed as being strong enough to absorb these losses without triggering a full-scale crisis.

In summary, the BoE’s view is that the banking system is strong enough to absorb major shocks [Ref 11]. The FSCS limit increase is primarily an inflation correction and a pre-emptive measure against the psychology of a digital bank run, rather than a sign of imminent banking sector distress.

Systemic Fear: The Shadow of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and the Fragile System
While inflation is the explicit rationale, the increase is heavily influenced by the need to fortify the banking system against systemic shocks, a lesson brutally reinforced by the 2023 US regional bank failures (e.g., Silicon Valley Bank). The PRA and the Bank of England (BoE) are acutely aware of the system’s fragility.

  • The SVB UK Precedent: The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) in the US was quickly followed by a crisis at its UK subsidiary, SVB UK. Regulators moved with extreme haste to orchestrate an emergency, solvent takeover of SVB UK by HSBC [Ref 5]. This action was necessary to prevent a wider panic in the UK’s tech and start-up sectors, which were heavily exposed. The speed and necessity of this intervention confirmed to UK regulators that the threat of a modern, digital bank run—where billions can flee a bank in a matter of hours—is immediate and real.
  • Digital Bank Run Defence: Raising the FSCS limit from £85,000 to £120,000 is a direct, pre-emptive measure to combat this fragility. It reduces the incentive for a large number of retail and small business depositors—particularly those with balances between £85,000 and £120,000—to panic and withdraw funds during a crisis. It effectively expands the population of protected, and thus psychologically “locked-in,” savers, providing a crucial buffer against systemic fear.
  • Closing the International Gap: The old £85,000 limit looked dangerously low compared to the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) limit of $250,000 (roughly £200,000). The move towards £120,000 is a necessary step to maintain the competitiveness and perceived safety of UK institutions on the global financial stage, especially when confidence is fragile [Ref 6].

The Real High-Value Story: The £1.4 Million Protection
A key change that received minimal press coverage was the increase in the cap for Temporary High Balances (THB) protection.

This protection covers funds from major life events like the sale of a house, an inheritance, or insurance payouts. The increase to £1.4 million is a critical mechanism for the banking industry:

  1. Retention of High-Net-Worth Liquidity: It ensures that high-value capital remains securely within the banking system during the sensitive period between transactions.
  2. Maintaining Market Stability: The regulators do not want to see multi-million-pound funds being pulled out of banks and converted into less liquid, non-bank assets (such as gold or overseas accounts) even temporarily. This measure is fundamentally about retaining significant capital within the UK financial ecosystem to ensure smooth market functioning [Ref 7].

In essence, the £120,000 figure addresses the pain of inflation and retail confidence in the shadow of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), while the £1.4 million figure quietly safeguards the stability and liquidity of high-net-worth transactions and the health of the banks themselves.

The Final Verdict from the Bench
From the pawnbroker’s lens, where we are not privileged to know all the internal information, we must judge the powers that be by their actions and make insightful judgments as to why. The decision to dramatically raise the FSCS limit is a response to monetary erosion and systemic fear. It is a defensive move.

Given this fragile system, do we trust their guarantee on cash more than we trust gold over the next 5-10 years? The evidence suggests that while banks are structurally sound, the currency is not. We continue to hedge against such volatility and be patient: hold gold, and stack small amounts on dips. Be your own judges, and as always, do your homework. (not financial advice)

References

  1. Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) Policy Statement on Deposit Protection Limit increase (Confirmed December 1st, 2025 effective date).
  2. Bank of England (BoE) Statement on the review of the deposit protection limit reflecting inflation data and consultations.
  3. Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) guidelines on deposit protection scope.
  4. London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) historical gold price data in GBP (January 2017 vs. Current November 2025).
  5. UK Government and Bank of England action regarding the resolution of Silicon Valley Bank UK (SVB UK).
  6. Comparison of international deposit insurance limits (e.g., US FDIC limit).
  7. FSCS guidelines on Temporary High Balances (THB) and their use in major transactions.
  8. Reference space intentionally left open.
  9. Bank of England (BoE) / Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) guidance on the 2025 Bank Capital Stress Test participants.
  10. Bank of England (BoE) guidance on the macroeconomic stress scenario parameters (e.g., 5% GDP fall, 8% Bank Rate).
  11. Bank of England (BoE) Financial Stability Report assessment on UK banking system resilience (July 2025).
  12. Bank of England (BoE) assessment on UK Commercial Real Estate (CRE) exposure and bank collateralisation.

Jaw-Dropping Price Predictions
To listen to Nomi Prins’s jaw-dropping predictions for gold, silver and mining stocks CLICK HERE OR ON THE IMAGE BELOW.

ALSO JUST RELEASED:  Crisis, Crash, Control The US CLICK HERE.
ALSO JUST RELEASED:  Massive Fraud In The Gold Market Just Exposed CLICK HERE.
ALSO JUST RELEASED:  Gold, Silver And The Bursting Of A Credit Bubble CLICK HERE.
ALSO JUST RELEASED:  Look At What Has Collapsed To Levels Last Seen During 2020 Panic CLICK HERE.
ALSO JUST RELEASED:  Here Is The Big Picture As Gold Price Remains Above $4,000 CLICK HERE.
ALSO JUST RELEASED:  Nomi Prins – China Is Buying A Lot More Gold Than They Are Reporting CLICK HERE.
ALSO JUST RELEASED:  The Metals Shortage Is Real And This Time It’s Global CLICK HERE.
ALSO JUST RELEASED:  Silver Price Remains Radically Undervalued vs 1980 High CLICK HERE.
ALSO JUST RELEASED:  Another Day In Clown World: Look At What Just Collapsed CLICK HERE.

© 2025 by King World News®. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.  However, linking directly to the articles is permitted and encouraged.