With the next global crisis dead ahead, gold will stand tall as the chaos unfolds.

Gold and Interest Rates
By Ronald-Peter Stoeferle, Incrementum AG Liechtenstein
June 28 (King World News) – 
In our 2015 In Gold We Trust report we already examined the relationship between gold and interest rates. The conclusion of our analysis was that rising nominal interest rates did not necessarily imply a decline in gold prices. We also pointed out that real interest rates are a more important driver of gold prices. We want to build on this and expand our analysis with respect to real, i.e., price inflation-adjusted interest rates…

Continue reading the Incrementum piece below…


Advertisement

To hear what billionaire Eric Sprott & Rick Rule are doing with their own
money and which $7 billion company John Embry &
Dr. Marc Faber oversee
 click on the logo:
Sprott_Asset_Management_LP


The following chart shows the trends in the real federal funds rate and the gold price since 1970.

kwn-stoferle-i-6282017

It turns out that time periods in which real interest rates are in negative territory for most of the time (highlighted in blue on the chart) go hand in hand with very strong gold prices. In the time period 1970 to 1980 gold climbed from 34,90 to a peak of 850 USD, in an environment of mostly negative real interest rates. The same applies to the 2003-2017 time period, in which gold rose from 356 to 1,260 USD (as of end of May2017). That represents a cumulative performance of approximately 9% per year. Conversely, markedly positive real interest rates create a relatively difficult environment for gold, as the period 1980 to 2003 makes clear.

The performance of different asset classes in different real interest rate environments is relevant from an investment and portfolio hedging perspective. The following table shows the average monthly performance of gold, silver, the S&P 500 Index as well as the Dollar Index since 1970 in a variety of real interest rate environments (in terms of the real Fed Funds rate).

kwn-stoferle-ii-6282017

The historical record indicates that gold and silver performed best in times when the real federal funds rate was in a range from -1% to +1%.

While gold performs best when real rates are negative, silver has problems with an environment of negative real rates. That makes sense intuitively, if one interprets the real federal funds rate as a proxy for expansionary or restrictive monetary policy.

A negative real federal funds rate (price inflation > federal funds rate) traditionally signals that monetary policy is accommodative or expansionary. By contrast, a clearly positive real federal funds rate (federal funds rate > price inflation) indicates a restrictive or hawkish monetary policy. As silver has a sizable demand component as an industrial metal in addition to monetary demand, it is no surprise that its performance often differs from that of gold. One must also keep in mind that silver tends to attract more speculative interest, not least because it is the smaller market. As the table also illustrates, volatility in silver tends to be far pronounced than in gold, i.e., it both outperforms to the upside and underperforms to the downside.

Along with the above, one should consider the following: empirical data such as these do have value in practice, and being aware of them is quite important for investors. It should be noted in this context that chart comparisons also show that there are frequently sizable leads and lags in evidence – at times the gold market discounts the future behavior of real interest rates in advance, and at times it reacts to the appearance of positive or negative real interest rates with a slight lag. The market is very often right, but it is not always right – in fact, it is a truism that the market is wrong at turning points, since at major lows and major peaks, it discounts a future that is not going to play out.

Lastly…
Lastly, experience also shows – and this is actually logical in a fiat money system in which the paper dollar is legal tender and must be purchased to liquidate dollar- denominated debt – that gold will tend to serve as a source of liquidity in the early stages of crises.

For instance, at the height of the 2008 panic, gold prices briefly declined and the US dollar soared, as banks outside the dollar area scrambled to obtain dollar liquidity and real interest rates spiked as inflation expectations decline rapidly (a situation known as a “deflation scare” – the gold price quickly recovered from this and soared subsequently). Gold reserves were used as collateral for dollar loans, and the lenders hedged the gold exposure they acquired when accepting gold as collateral. Such hedging activities always involve outright selling somewhere down the line of the chain of transactions. Gold is always and everywhere accepted as collateral – when push comes to shove, its acceptability as collateral exceeds that of any debt instrument, including treasury bonds. Gold is the only money that can stand tall even without “backing” from an outsized military force.

***To listen to the remarkable audio interview with Madoff whistleblower Harry Markopolos that has just been released CLICK HERE OR ON THE IMAGE BELOW.

***ALSO JUST RELEASED: The ECB Is Already In A Panic CLICK HERE.

kwn-markopolos-mp3-6242017

© 2017 by King World News®. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.  However, linking directly to the articles is permitted and encouraged.

King World News RSS Feed